Re: [TenTec] Re: An example of changing Orion firmware to meetexpectationsof

["Les Peters, N1SV" <n1sv@comcast.net>]

Sorry I just forwarded the message from the YCCC reflector I don't have 
any additional information.
Ron Martin wrote:

> Please read Barry's text, second to last paragraph.  I answered a 
> question ....
> Please read my response, first line, Duane.  I agreed with Barry's point.
> Being an engineering manager, one of the points that I have learned in 
> this business is to make requirements as clear as possible......  
> Actually, I would like to have the choice of just transferring 
> frequency and mode included.  So, everyone can not be satisfied all 
> the time......
> Have a Good Day Duane.
>
> Ron......NU1U
> Duane A Calvin writes:
>
> > Barry's point, if you re-read his note, is to allow the user to select
> > whether he wants all the information transferred to the subRX or 
> > not.  In
> > other words, you get to choose how it works.  I'm sure you don't object
> > to that since you can have it the way you want - - until next week when
> > you decide you could use it the other way, then you still get it the way
> > you want!  Win-win solution.
> >         73,  Duane
> >
> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:41:12 GMT Ron Martin <royalct@inr.net> writes:
> >
> > > You got it Barry,
> > > Also, I do object for all the reciever modes/setup/whatever being 
> > > transferred to the sub receiver.  I want to set up my sub receiver 
> > > the way I want and only have its frequency change when I push the 
> > > A>B button. 
> > >  
> > >
> > > Ron....NU1U 
> > >  
> > > Barry N1EU writes: 
> > > > NU1U opined: "This only drives the point that what is
> > > > transferred to the Orions's subreceiver should be user
> > > > selectable. All I want to transfer to the subreceiver
> > > > is the frequency and maybe the mode." > > Since the Orion is NOT 
> > > endowed with unlimited memory
> > > > space, I would think there are memory constraints to
> > > > consider in storing more user configurable option
> > > > pipedreams. > > So let me get this straight.  You'd actually 
> > > object to
> > > > bandwith and AGC being transferred along with mode? > You prefer 
> > > to end up with 500hz/fastAGC in USB (if
> > > > your subreceiver had been previously set for cw) or
> > > > 2.4KHz/slowAGC in cw (if your subreceiver had been
> > > > previously set for SSB)? > > If you need to give some user 
> > > configuation, I think a
> > > > simple yes/no suffices: when I push A-->B, either
> > > > leave my subreceiver alone (No) or make my subreceiver
> > > > mode/BW/AGC/PBT/whatever just like my main receiver
> > > > (Yes). > > 73,
> > > > Barry N1EU > > >                 > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
> > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >  
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >  
> >
> > Duane Calvin, AC5AA
> > Austin, Texas
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec