TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] Re: An example ofchanging Orionfirmwaretomeetexpectations

To: tentec@contesting.com, nq5t@comcast.net
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: An example ofchanging Orionfirmwaretomeetexpectations
From: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Reply-to: eric@k3na.org, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:47:04 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Grant --

   Yes, you're missing a point which I didn't make clear.

   Of course overwriting the B VFO frequency is the desired result when one 
purposely pushes the A>B button.  The human factors
issues come in to play because we make mistakes.  What if one didn't intend to 
push that particular button?  Now you're in a
position where it is difficult to recover, if recovery is possible.  In this 
example, if A>B was pressed accidentally, then you need
to remember what the B VFO frequency was before in order to effect a recovery.

   Even worse, suppose that you intended to copy the B VFO into A, but press 
the A>B button instead?  Those two buttons are
adjacent.  A sleepy operator, or someone slightly lesdyxic, or someone in a 
hurry could press that button.  And look at the state of
the radio thereafter: the B VFO frequency is lost, and the frequency now in 
both B and A is not what was desired.  This is
definitely the time to have a un-do function.

   My earlier message was an attempt to broaden the issue under consideration 
so that any improvement provided both an un-do
capability as well as a "copy the frequency only" and "copy frequency and other 
receiver parameters" into the A>B and B>A actions.
Secondly, the push-and-hold action takes longer than a double-push.  A 
double-push would be a better choice for the "copy frequency
and parameters" action, reserving the push-and-hold for unusual situations 
(e.g., recover from operator error).

   Hope this is clearer.

-- Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Grant Youngman
Sent: 2004 July 11 10:52
To: eric@k3na.org; tentec@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: An example ofchanging
Orionfirmwaretomeetexpectations


>    Actually, this is NOT such a good approach.
>
>    From an ergonomics viewpoint, the press of the A>B button is an
>    example of an unrecoverable, destructive action.  The frequency
> of the B-VFO is wiped out: the "destructive" part.  Once the B-VFO
> frequency has been overwritten, it can not be recovered.

Well, yes ... I though that was the point of A>B.  Am I missing something?

I'd say the difference between a "press" and a "press and hold" ought to
be pretty easy to get one's arms around.  And in any case are you goibng
to lose the contest in the unlikely event that you actually hold the button
down for a full second when you only meant to tap it?  You're more likely
to spill that fresh cup of coffee all over the laptop sitting on the desk :-)

Grant/NQ5T

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>