| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] The '7800 review |
| From: | K4IA@aol.com |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:17:27 EDT |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Right on! QST is getting to be like a lot of other hobby magazines. They never met a stinker piece of gear. The old saw, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all," seems to apply. Judging what was said (big, heavy, nice meters) against what was unsaid (anything of substance), I conclude the reviewers didn't find a lot to crow about. On good authority, I understand it is not selling well at all. Radio k4ia "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ebay Scam, Bill NY9H |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TopTen Devices Band Decoder for Jupiter?, doc |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] The '7800 review, al_lorona |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] The '7800 review, w8au |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |