TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: It's a pity

To: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: It's a pity
From: Ed <w3nr@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:46:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Martin Ewing wrote:
I sympathize with the wish to share.  On the other hand, it's a
copyrighted and restricted article.  I wonder where the line on "fair
use" is drawn in Newington.  Sending someone a copy is much less an
issue than posting it on your website for the world, but a lawyer
might not agree.

73, Martin AA6E


On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:22:40 -0500, Ed <w3nr@comcast.net> wrote:

Larry Keith wrote:

It's a pity that he just didn't ask for a copy of the article..  Someone
might have downloaded it and e-mailed it to him.

Already on the way to him. I always thought that part of being a ham was
to share information. Any others needing a copy please feel free to ask,
I'll gladly send you a copy via email.

73

Ed W3NR


As my beloved Grandpa would have said " I don't give a rats patooey". Its a product review article, not the plans for an atomic bomb. I'll bet TT even has a downloaded reprint floating around.

Ed W3NR


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 3/21/2005


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>