TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops
From: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:42:55 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Again.... I do not do much code, got into the hobby to say technically
challenged.  Hated the 5wpm when I passed my novice exam in 1971. Took me 6
attempts to pass the 13 wpm and 8 attempts over 5 years to pass 20 wpm.  I
only did 13 to use SSB on HF and only did 20 to become a VE.

Keep the code, this is needed to keep some degree of difficulty in getting
into our hobby and this keeps the nar-do-wells out!  

Further, Lets make the General and Extra written tests mean something.  Too
may of our new Generals and Extras can't put up a dipole, have no idea what
a filter is or how a transistor works.  Having a technical discussion at
what use to be a General class level leaves half of the Generals and Extras
I know looking at the ceiling and wishing to be somewhere else.

73 Rick 
N4ASx

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Paul - W8KC
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 1:21 AM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops



-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Ken Brown

>>I did not even start to like CW until I got to about 10 WPM or more...



I was not going to jump into YACWD (Yet Another CW Debate) but Brother Ken
speaks the truth.  Ken's experience is identical to mine and probably to the
vast majority of hams who slogged through the Novice exam and worked up to
the 13 WPM General test.

This is also what I claim as what will be the root cause of the ultimate
demise of CW.  It's just too much of a bother to work toward CW proficiency
when the microphone is also plugged into the HF rig.

I back this up with the fact that in the dozens amateurs in the local ham
clubs that I belong to or are familiar with, I know of only ONE "no code"
era ham who can send and receive CW at 20+ WPM.

30 years ago, I recall folks saying that once a Novice got a Technician
license and a 2M FM rig, they were pretty much doomed.  They became what
were jokingly known as a tech-for-life.  These folks would be on the
repeaters all of the time TALKING about upgrading to 13 WPM General, but
rarely achieving that goal.

Of course that changed a few years ago with the 5 WPM General and Extra. The
techs-for-life were given a new life when they gained HF privileges.  Except
that their Morse skills never improved.

That's just my observation here near Detroit.  I know that there are
probably many instances for "no-code" era hams that have gone on to actually
become CW proficient.  Perhaps they even love CW as much as old-time TenTec
users do.  

Yet I bet that if you examine them, you'll find some other driver that
motivated them toward CW proficiency.  QRP operation comes to mind as an
excellent niche where you'd find more "new" hams that operate and enjoy CW
at what the rest of us consider a comfortable speed.
 
Because CW at 5 WPM is, well... painful.  

If you want to encourage CW operation, you gotta bite the bullet every now
and then and work some newish-prefixed call who is fumbling on a straight
key at those speeds.

Even to this day I recall the shock experienced as a Novice when my pitiful
7 or 8 WPM CQ was answered flawlessly by a guy with a 1x2 callsign.

73 =paul= W8KC
Collector of Ten*Tecs and other fine plastics.
Visit the Virtual Ten*Tec Museum at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/w8kc/tentec.html
Listen to 7.040 MHz from anywhere with Media Player v9
http://www.w8kc.com/stream.asx


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>