TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] cw creation

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] cw creation
From: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <dock0evz@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: dock0evz@earthlink.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:32:26 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bob:

I also seem vaguely to remember something about a few weeks to people
wondering about how a few folks were reacting to the sound of their Jupiter
keying sounds.  After that it appeared to die down.  But it was enough to
scare me away from the rig.  Never did in fact go after one of them.  I
never heard the the effect, myself.   Hmmm.  GL in your quest.  

73,
--Doc/K0EVZ


> [Original Message]
> From: Bob Stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: 4/23/2005 3:13:35 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] cw creation
>
> Sometime in  the past there was a discussion of how modern rigs such as
the 
> Orion or Jupiter produce "cw" as opposed to the way classic cw is/was 
> produced in classic rigs. Unfortunately I can't seem to find the thread 
> either through Google or in the Archive.
>
> As I understand it, in many modern rigs cw keying is done by injecting an 
> audio tone (onto a ssb signal ?), rather than  true on off carrier
keying. 
> This almost sounds a bit like the difference between FSK and AFSK.
>
> Could someone on the list help me understand this better, and could
someone 
> also list which TT rigs produce "cw" which way?
>
> tnx
> Bob, KB1CIW
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>