| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] CQWW CW contest (k3hx@juno.com) |
| From: | john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:14:28 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>I don't use machines to copy code so somebody blazing away at 40+ wpm calling
>CQ gets ignored.
I don't think there's many/any folks using machine copy during a
contest...they just dont
work as well as the machine between our ears, particularly in a high QRM
environment. If
there's ever a time to evaluate one's favorite Tentec rig on adjacent freq
strong signal
rejection, CW CQWWDX is it...particularly on 40m at night! :-)
John K5MO
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 61, leonard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 62, Malcolm McLeman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 61, leonard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 62, Malcolm McLeman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |