TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Old Crows

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Old Crows
From: "Chip Morgan" <wmorgan@outdrs.net>
Reply-to: Chip Morgan <wmorgan@ieee.org>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:56:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, AOC is still very active.  Try www.crows.org.  That should get you there.

73,

Chip N3IW (an active Old Crow)

> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:06:30 -0600
> From: "David S.McCallum" <w7sac2@cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <032901c611ad$68b20770$5316e444@your4105e587b6>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I think there is an organization either at Eglin or Hurlbert Field, Mac
> 
> David S. McCallum/USAF RET./CMSGT/W7SAC/4
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <CATFISHTWO@aol.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
> 
> 
> 
> I found many places on a google search and this one has some links's.. 
> looks
> like us card carrying members are still here....
> 
> _http://oldcrows.ras.com/_ (http://oldcrows.ras.com/)
> 
> 
> 73 and gud DX  tokm N6AJR
> 
> In a message dated 1/3/2006 7:27:17 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> ghoffman@spacetech.com writes:
> 
> Is the  association of old crows still around ?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message  ----- 
> From: <CATFISHTWO@aol.com>
> To:  <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:31  PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK =  Radar
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Its nice to meet another Old  Crow, on the reflector. I did 8 years in 
> > the
> > U.S.A.F. in ECM repair,  everything from B-52's  to F100s, F4c, 
> > weasels,
> > and   the
> > odd  stuff we still can't talk about.. ECM , where Jam It  takes on a
> > whole
> > new meaning.
> >
> > tom  N6AJR
> >
> > In a message dated 1/3/2006 7:12:52 A.M. Pacific  Standard Time,
> > glhuber@msn.com writes:
> >
> > When the   Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used 
> > the
> >  HF
> > echo to  "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with  their 
> > OTHR
> > pulse timing  and jam their "B" scopes. As a former  Radar Electronics
> > Counter-Measures and  Electronics  Counter-Counter-Measures operator, 
> > I
> > knew it was simply
> > a  matter  of transmitting a signal of about the same frequency, 
> > duration,
> > and
> > slightly  stronger than their "return" to confuse  their operators. By
> > setting
> > my keyer  speed so that I  did not hear their pulse while QSK at 100 W 
> > and
> > by
> >  calling  HH5HH with the beam pointed at the strongest OTHR signal, 
> > I'd
> > usually
> > hear  them go QRT or find someplace else to  play. Calling HH5HH QSK 
> > at the
> > OTHR  pulse rate worked well until  the Soviets started using digital
> > signal
> > processing, then it  became a "overload signal game" with less 
> > apparent
> > success   in
> > forcing them to QSY or QRT.
> >
> > By the way my RADAR set  back then was a  Ten-Tec OMNI-D....
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Gary -  AB9M
> >  CSM(r)G.L.Huber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing  list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>