| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) |
| From: | "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 07:29:34 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
960 exceeds V by CML. This will create an inverted nomenclature designation. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message), louis garrison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Headphone Redux, Lee A Crocker |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message), louis garrison |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message), Ron Zond |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |