TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message)

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message)
From: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:40:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
960 exceeds V by CMLV. Quintius Flavius
Minimus told me I was his star pupil in math (Roman) back in 150 AD. Oh, for
the good old days.

Ron
K3MIY

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mike Hyder -N4NT-
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:30 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no
message)


960 exceeds V by CML.  This will create an inverted nomenclature
designation.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>