TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?

from [Ron Castro] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:46:17 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
If you're using the narrow (HC-4) element, a "bad" audio report is
probably accurate regardless of the rig it's attached to!

       73,  Duane
And probably exactly what you want to have. The big guns that bust the pile-ups are proud that they sound like Darth Vader on steroids! 

Ron Castro
Chief Technical Officer
Results Radio, LLC
----- Original Message ----- From: "Duane A Calvin" <ac5aa@juno.com> 
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] OII TX Audio experiment/findings, Kc9cdt
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK bug - this is not a bug, Ron Castro
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?, Grant Youngman
Next by Thread:  [TenTec] Orion V2.055, bob finger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]