TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Sweep on O2

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Sweep on O2
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:41:49 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ten Tec is apparently planning a "High Speed Sweep" accessory, or so says their web site. This may be the cure to those complaints.

Ron Castro
Chief Technical Officer
Results Radio, LLC


----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Sweep on O2


What else besides the Sweep and the NR that is broke in the
O2?

It's true that the sweep may not meet everyone's operating needs.  It's
better than it has been previously, and is certainly more than adequate for
my use.

As I indicated in a post last night, I found the SNR -- actually (S+N)/N --
ratio to be improved by at least 10-12dB under VERY difficult noise
conditions when using NR.  I was actually quite surprised at that result.

On 20M this morning, with very differenct noise conditions than last night I
measuredthe SNR increase to be on the order of 20dB.  It was less at very
narrow CW bandwidths, but that's to be expected since there's less noise to begin with -- the narrow bandwidth itself improves NSR ratio. At a setting
of NR = 1 I measured about 10dB improvement, and at a setting of NR = 9 I
measured about 20dB overall using bandwidths of 1Khz and greater.

Everyone has to make up there own mind whether that constitutes "broken", I
guess.

Grant/NQ5T


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>