TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (Randy K7RAN)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (Randy K7RAN)
From: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:18:23 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
If price were no object, I would buy both, put an equal amount into the antenna system and hire someone to maintain the property so I could spend all my time experimenting and on the air.

If I merely wanted bragging rights for having the most expensive radio I would buy the 7800. And it does have some likable bells and whistles. If I were locked into the human factors associated with the several generations of YaeComWood radios then this may be the best choice.

If I wanted the best receiver available for digging weak signals out of the noise on the band or during contest or pile up conditions, I believe the ORION is it. The lab tests and review of the design back up this position. A formidable discussion group does surface areas for improvement and TenTec listens and responds in a responsible manner. You do have to learn how to operate this radio for best performance.

When economics are a factor I recommend the Orion along with the best antennas I can afford. Wait a minute, I did that in March 2003. And I just got a factory upgrade via software version 2.056 to bring me up to the equivalent of the 1996 version of the radio. And with N4PY software I can display a sweep with 120 dbm dynamic range. Now I am still a happy camper.

John KH7T

Randy K7RAN <k7randy@gmail.com wrote:

If price were no object (say, hypothetically, if both rigs cost exactly the same), which radio would you prefer? Along that line, are there certain operating "types" who might prefer one more than the other? (Incidentally, there is nothing motivating this question other than conversation and curiosity.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (Randy K7RAN), John Buck <=