| To: | geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:39:52 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
And when using a crystal filter to reject the unwanted sideband, instead of using the phasing method of SSB generation, the unwanted sideband rejection is not degraded when using the "non-normal" sideband.More recent Tentecs mix the PTO to 27 MHz to take the difference for 18 MHz which puts the normal sideband on lower which doesn't match the rest of thee world, but it removes nearly all of the transmitter spur. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] OMNI V . 9, jack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Orion 1.373b5 Audio, Merle Bone |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test, Ron |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters!, Randy K4QO |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |