| To: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Roofing Filters |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 May 2006 11:16:28 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In my previous post I should have changed the subject title. Another observation about the term "roofing filter":I don't recall hearing the term used until receivers were being made that used IF DSP. Is the term only applicable to receivers using IF DSP?I know that Inrad makes a roofing filter modification for the Omni VI rigs. Is that an incorrect usage of the term? All filters in all stages of a receiver perform essentially the same functions. That is to limit the bandwidth that following stages have to handle, and when before a mixer to reject image response, or when before a ADC in a DSP receiver to reduce aliasing responses. So what makes some filters "roofing filters" and others not? DE N6KB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II NR and Notch - Thoughts?, Carl Moreschi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] FT-2000 Webpage, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] FT-2000 Webpage, Ken Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Roofing Filters, Phil Chambley, Sr. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |