| To: | Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? |
| From: | Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:00:11 +0100 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Ron Castro wrote: > 3). The missing 9 dB of low frequency response at 50 Hz as shown in the > specifications; Ron I am fascinated to find out why a better response is needed at 50Hz. A bass singing voice might go down to 65Hz but I am unaware of the communications advantage. Pete, G4PLZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems?, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Fwd: Is Orion really worth it? Giventhepublishedproblems?, ROBERT CARROLL |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems?, Tommy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems?, Peter Connors |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |