Yes, I see that from the measurement you report on your website but that
isn't what your bullet point was and I still don't quite understand the
need for an increase in response at 50Hz. I think you might mean "I
would prefer the lf response to begin rolling off later".
For the measurement you didn't specify where the output is measured from
- is it at the antenna socket at full output but before ALC action
starts? This would help this ex-BBC engineer to attempt to replicate
your findings.
Pete, G4PLZ
Ron Castro wrote:
> The roll-off starts at 400 Hz.
>
> Ron Castro
> Chief Technical Officer
> Results Radio, LLC
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Connors" <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published
> problems?
>
>
>> Ron Castro wrote:
>>
>>> 3). The missing 9 dB of low frequency response at 50 Hz as shown in
>>> the specifications;
>> Ron
>>
>> I am fascinated to find out why a better response is needed at 50Hz. A
>> bass singing voice might go down to 65Hz but I am unaware of the
>> communications advantage.
>>
>> Pete, G4PLZ
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|