| To: | gsm@mendelson.com, tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII |
| From: | CATFISHTWO@aol.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:13:46 EDT |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 8/3/2006 3:12:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, gsm@mendelson.com writes: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0700, Grant Youngman wrote: > Frankly, since it's something other than SNOBOL and the underlying machine > architecture isn't bi-quinary, I'm not so sure that the whole thing isn't a > fool's errand ;-) how about CPM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII, Larry Menzel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Being tired of "On being a contrarian", Jim Lowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII, CATFISHTWO |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII, Caitlyn Martin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |