| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] AM Output Level 2.037j |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:14:17 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> as the modulation increased. I think I remember this being > detailed somewhere (maybe in Doug Smith's writings) about a > DSP AM design that automatically corrects the carrier level > to accommodate the amount of modulation applied, Yes, that's correct. But the v1 put out a good, solid 25W of carrier. Although there was some shift. I was always able to set the drive to the amp and load to a full 1500 watts, and then see that 1500 watts peak when transmitting AM. Can't do it now. I still think the v1 sounds better on transmit. Look for another posting I'm about to put out. Grant/NQ5T |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] AM Output Level 2.037j, Ron Castro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] AM Ouput Level 2.037j, Grant Youngman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] AM Output Level 2.037j, Ron Castro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] AM Ouput Level 2.037j, Grant Youngman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |