| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews |
| From: | ron <roncasa@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | roncasa@verizon.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:11:21 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
he did not know how to experience "Oprion" ..... Ron, wb1hga Grant Youngman wrote:> But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the comments overall. Interesting points of view. One guy even thought his Swan 500 was a better radio. Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one), was "1000 time [sic] better". He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-) Sometimes you just have to shake your head .... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Kc9cdt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Ron Castro |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Grant Youngman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Ron Castro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |