> I'm not trying to split hairs with you or be blindly
> argumentative....however, a DSP processor does nothing else,
> by the definition of the term. If it is a general purpose
> processor, capable of doing "something else" then by
> definition, it is not a DSP processor, which is not capable
> (in general) of doing something else, and in practice, is not
> used to do something else.
By "other tasks" I was referring to other DSP tasks, not GP computing tasks.
The DSP processors have a LOT of work to do.
Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|