| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:31:32 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> I'm not trying to split hairs with you or be blindly > argumentative....however, a DSP processor does nothing else, > by the definition of the term. If it is a general purpose > processor, capable of doing "something else" then by > definition, it is not a DSP processor, which is not capable > (in general) of doing something else, and in practice, is not > used to do something else. By "other tasks" I was referring to other DSP tasks, not GP computing tasks. The DSP processors have a LOT of work to do. Grant/NQ5T |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting, Barry Gross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting, Grant Youngman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting, Gary Hoffman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting, Ken Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |