TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code
From: "John B. Egger" <john_egger@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:54:28 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
john wrote:

Its pretty sad that some people believe the ARRL did anything to keep code. Regardless of multiple member polls, they've always been lukewarm code supporters at best.

The FCC I understand...they're a big lazy bureaucracy, and we're nothing but a money sink. Their success at getting away with abdicating their responsibilities is impressive however. Can you imagine if long haul truckers were able to get their drivers licenses from trucker school?

A sad day. Off to the bottom end of 20, before the ARRLs winlink jammers get to it...

        John K5MO



Probably not coincidentally, the CW portions of our bands have been drastically reduced. Admittedly some of them were seldom crowded, but it just seems like part of the same picture.

As for the ARRL, I agree with John... lukewarm on CW, at best. Every mention of expanded phone bands in QST, or in the emailed ARRL letters, seemed to have triple exclamation marks. Well, until the FCC actually outlaws CW that's where I'll be.

--
--John K3GHH
Registered Linux User #291592


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>