TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:08:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
At 08:10 PM 12/16/06, george fritkin wrote:
>It is in the interest of the ARRL to have as many hams as 
>possible.  Membership is a numbers game and ADS pay the bills.  No 
>code = more hams...I rest my case.

Nice theory, but not foolproof.  The no-code license from 1992 on 
raised the number of new hams, but did not correspondingly increase 
ARRL membership.  What you achieve easily does not maintain loyalty 
or promote serious interest, generally speaking....

Perry  w8au 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>