| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:09:01 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Martin and group,I am not advocating overprocessed SSB, in fact I don't advocate phone operation at all, especially for DXing and contesting. However the phone signal that sounds "cleanest and clearest" is likely the one with just the right amount of properly done processing, more likely than one with no processing at all. When some is good, more is not always better. This is especially true with compression or clipping. DE N6KB a short comment on calling DX with "processed" signals.I always work the cleanest clearest signal first.Simply the cleanest clearest signal gets through first - not just fromoperator choice but because they come through the pile best.P.S. HiFi audio is not good for cracking a pile up - too much power wasted in the lows where there is no intelligibility. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Radio Control/Contesting??, AD5VJ Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec] Need some General and opinions of the Omni V, Ken Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX, Ron Notarius W3WN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX, Grant Youngman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |