TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Radio Control/Contesting??

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Control/Contesting??
From: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Please also see the numbers posted by Inrad, on an Omni VI with the
addition of their roofing filter. Flop those numbers into Rob
Sherwoods table, and have another eye opener!! Merry CHRISTmas to
all.

Greg Schippers, KC8HXO


--- AD5VJ  Bob <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Which model is considered the best for computer control? I am
> considering a Ten Tec for my next contest station set up.
> 
> Don't flame me I am simply relaying an experience:
> I have heard on contest lists that Ten Tec has too soft a front end
> for contesting, and that it should only be considered for casual
> Dxing or for an "everyday" rig. 
> 
> That for true Dxing and hard core contesting, the Yaesu FT-1000D is
> the only way to go.
> 
> What are your thoughts and experiences on this? The reason I am
> asking is that after having my "new to me" OMNI D series B, I am
> not
> sure anymore that the above statement is true.
> 
> This is a pretty tight rig.
> 
>   73 fer nw es gud DX,
> QSL VIA: BUR, LotW, e-QSL
> Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM)
> Old calls: WY5L/KH3-KE5CTY-N5IET
> http://www.ad5vj.com/
> 
> Member: CTDXCC, NTCC, STXDXCC
> FISTS: # 12637, SKCC# 2369
> 10X# 37210, FP#-1141
> SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>