| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] code speed |
| From: | Curt Gamble <W0ALC@Mindspring.Com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:30:22 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
W8AU,Well we had CT's (communication technicians) then whose sole purpose was to monitor all circuits including ours so think that was kept in check. I know one of those CT types as he is a good ham friend in AZ. I am sure some stuff might have gone on briefly but busting rank tends to stop it. While the shoulder patch for Navy radioman looks the same I think radioman are now called communication technicians or something like that. Last year in Dayton I talked with one at the MARS boothWhen I finally received my 160M WAS award back in Ohio in early 1970's (as K8IBQ) I recall that my Kentucky contact was K4FU. It is funny how one remembers certain things. A ham friend of mine, Jim and I were both in the same high school English class and during a test (multiple guess) Jim started tapping out with a pencil a query to one question in the multiple guess test. Pretty soon a 3rd pencil started tapping out "this will not work". We both darn near died and the teacher was in hysterics laughing at us. The rest of the class was clueless. This great English teacher still communicates via email as does the ham friend. Yes! he was on of those WW2 Army Signal Corps CW guys. We tell this story over and over at each reunion. 73, Curt WØALC in Western CO at minus 2.5 deg w8au@sssnet.com wrote: At 06:28 PM 1/14/07, Curt Gamble wrote:Another funny incident on a Navy practice cw circuit in Norfolk in mid 60's some operator sent the following. "Mississippi sissies are sissier than Tennessee sissies" as fast as possible. They called all the logs in so they could figure who sent it and this individual got a few demerits on that one.An associate of mine who was an Army radio op during WW2 said that they occasionally signed off with "4Q." To which the other op would reply "4Q2." This upset the monitors who sent messages to all commands to cease this activity. :-)I don't recall ever hearing that the Navy ops did this... Either the Army ops were cruder, or the Navy ops weren't as creative... :-)w8au_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] code speed, w8au |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] unsuscribe, NMARCHIC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] code speed, w8au |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] unsuscribe, NMARCHIC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |