> Grant, the NR on my 1000mp smokes the Orion II in every
> sense. The NR on my
> TS-2000 smokes the NR on the Orion II again in every sense.
> The bottom line
As an afterthought, I'll be happy -- if someone would provide one or both of
these two radios -- to replicate the tests I ran on the Orion I/II regarding
Nr driven improvement in SNR vs. receive bandwidth. Alternatively, I'd be
happy to discuss the methods and systems used in some detail so that the
tests could be replicated by anyone else wanting to take it on.
The results from the first round gave the nod to the original Orion NR code,
quite better than the Orion II revision. Neither were good at narrow
bandwidths (and I'd wager the 1000MP or TS-2000 suffer the same fate, not
because I have second sight, but because of the physics of noise). You can
find the data back in the archive -- I lost a disk drive along the way, and
no longer have the original posting in my mail archive.
Might be an interesting comparison, and would certainly wrap some facts
around what are otherwise anecdotal rants (in stereo) about who's is better.
If you can find me an NR in-radio-function or external box -- amateur radio
equipment, affordable, no DARPA or NIST projects worth big bucks -- that
actually works the miracles attributed to it at all times, in every case,
I'll buy it. Shucks, I'll buy TWO. Or at least nominate it for radio
saint-hood :-)
Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|