TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net Frequencies & Times?

To: kd3jf@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net Frequencies & Times?
From: John/K4WJ <k4wj@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:52:39 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Pual,

0000 begins the new day. It is like 12:00 a.m. (midnight). It is the time between 2359 and 0001. :-) How did the military teach you to treat the time between 2359 and 0001? Did they pretend it didn't exist?

It is amazing how many OTs still don't use UTC. I mean some ex military guys that have been hams since the 50s.

BTW, I was a radio operator in the Navy back in the early 60s.

73..de John/K4WJ


At 05:33 PM 9/9/2007, you wrote:
What amuses me is when some hams use 2400 hrs... No such thing IMO. There is 2359 and then 0000 hrs. At least that is what I learned in the Army.

Paul Gates, KD3JF

Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>  I dunno -- UTC seems so easy to me - just get it from WWV - no
> calculations - no looking up is  daylight savings there , do they have
> daylight savings , no plus or minus an hour etc etc .
>
>
>
UTC is the standard way of expressing time of day by all radio operators
who are communicating between different time zones. All radio operators
should know the number of hours difference between their own local time
and UTC. This is easy to do, and when you know your own offset from UTC
there is no need to know what the offset is in other locations, provided
that UTC time is used for published radio schedules. Using this long
established standardized system is simple, effective and works for
everybody in all time zones. Older ARRL publications even state that
this is the correct and sensible way to do it. It requires less space to
print a schedule this way too, even if along with the schedule offsets
for a few time zones are printed for new operators who do net yet know
their UTC offset. It is truly bizarre that ARRL refuses to use the time
honored standard.

DE N6KB

73..de John/K4WJ
ex K8PXG 06/18/59 to 02/12/97
K8WJ 02/12/97 to 04/08/97



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>