TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] dual receive

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] dual receive
From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:35:55 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It works fine to find the callers for the DX station.  The receiver is
actually almost the same as the Jupiter receiver without the bells and
whistles.

73,

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Drive
Bell Mountain
Hays, NC 28635
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Rippey" <w3uls73@gmail.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:02 PM
Subject: [TenTec] dual receive


> Carl, et al:
>
> Re the RX-320 as a second receiver, my impression is that it's a
> pretty primitive receiver and would not hold up in pileups, etc. Am I
> wrong?
>
> 73,
> John, W3ULS
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>