TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio
From: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Reply-to: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:51:11 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Terry, N4TZ/9 has touched on an important point that has long been a priority on my list of receiver specifications that are relevant and those that are less relevant. Two tone IMD is not at the top on my list. A related parameter which is similar but not identical is receiver desensitization. This requires only one off freqeuncy signal, not two. And there is not a precise frequency requirement as with two tone IMD. In adddition, I have also noticed that often a still more pernicious phenomena is transmitted broadband phase noise. Several field day operations have been ruined primarily by these two types of interference and not two tone IMD. I also wish to add that two tone IMD is more serious on CW becaue both signals are always transmitted at full power. On the other hand, with SSB, both transmittiers must hit peak power simultaneoulsy for a third order product to be generated in the receiver. Due to the instantaneous peaks of speech that occur at a sporatic manner, the probability of this happening is greatly lessened and when it does happen, the interference is an extremely short spurt.

73, AL, w6wqc



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>