| To: | "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio |
| From: | "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:35:47 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The Sherwood Presentation and data is only one set of parameters for judging
a receiver performance. Truly there are others that are more or less
important to each of us.
Just this morning, in a SSB QSO on 75M, the other fellows in the group complained that a QSO some 3 kHz downband on USB was clobbering them. I did a SWP and indeed saw the signals downband as well as those on the frequency of which I was in the QSO. On my Omni VII I tuned VFO B downband 3 kHz and switched to USB. Sure enough there was a QSO in progress. Signals were running about S-5 to maybe S-9 in that QSO. Switching back to VFO A and LSB the signals in the QSO there were running S-9 +10 to 20 dB. The end result, I had no problem copying the stations in my QSO and was not bothered the least by the QSO on USB some 3 kHz downband. I find it interesting that some radios seem to have a problem with this condition while others do not. Yes, there's more to receiver performance than 2 kHz dynamic range performance. 73 Bob, K4TAX----- Original Message ----- From: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio Terry, N4TZ/9 has touched on an important point that has long been a priority on my list of receiver specifications that are relevant and thosethat are less relevant. Two tone IMD is not at the top on my list. A relatedparameter which is similar but not identical is receiver desensitization. This requires only one off freqeuncy signal, not two. And there is not a precise frequency requirement as with two tone IMD. In adddition, I have also noticed that often a still more pernicious phenomena is transmitted broadband phase noise. Several field day operations have been ruined primarily by these two types of interference and not two tone IMD. I alsowish to add that two tone IMD is more serious on CW becaue both signals arealways transmitted at full power. On the other hand, with SSB, both transmittiers must hit peak power simultaneoulsy for a third order product to be generated in the receiver. Due to the instantaneous peaks of speech that occur at a sporatic manner, the probability of this happening is greatly lessened and when it does happen, the interference is an extremely short spurt. 73, AL, w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni V meter, Bob McGraw - K4TAX |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OmniV and PSK31, Larry Rockne |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio, Alfred Lorona |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio, Duane Calvin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |