TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus audio

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus audio
From: veast1 <veast1@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:04:50 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
And to think i put the INRAD 2.1 khz filter in the OEM Y2 filter slot in
the 9 mhz i.f. and love it.
Paul (N6MYA)


On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 20:01 -0400, Paul Christensen wrote:
> > Our club's Omni6+ option3 sounds very different on USB and LSB, and it's 
> > not possible to correct it by adjusting the BFO frequencies, so it must be 
> > down to the filter being asymetrical.  I understood that was a common 
> > failing, but perhaps our filter is faulty?
> 
> As is I recall, my Omni Six resulted in upward passband shift in USB, which 
> result in "thinner' audio with less low-end audio content.  To localize it 
> to the filter, bypass the 2.4K filter with a wire will and the likely result 
> is audio that is equal in response on both USB and LSB.
> 
> The INRAD 2.8K filter in the 2.4k @ 9MHz slot will result in better SSB 
> symmetry between LSB and USB, and may in fact clean up the transmitted CW 
> since the CW TX BFO frequency is shifted further away from the knee of the 
> filter.  The introduction of the INRAD 2.8K filter was a joint effort 
> between myself and W2VJN to assist with the Omni Six's transmitted CW issue. 
> The secondary benefit was better SSB audio quality.
> 
> Paul, W9AC 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>