| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3 |
| From: | "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:49:47 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Wayne Whitman <wwhitman@fastmail.fm> wrote: > The Orion II comes in last. > To me, it sounds harsh. That's the simplest way to put it. In > addition, the passband tuning doesn't cut it compared to the Omni VI+ or > the Drake. It doesn't peak like the others and it doesn't tune as > sharply. I've got an Orion I (v1) and a K3. I'm not sure if I can provide helpful input Wayne because my experience of the Orion is that it certainly doesn't sound harsh and the PBT seems fine, although it doesn't "peak" (why should it?). 73, Barry N1EU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Inrad, Gerry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Inrad 1000 Hz filter #766, Marinus Loewensteijn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3, Wayne Whitman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II vs K3, Wayne Whitman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |