TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] CW filters Omni-C

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] CW filters Omni-C
From: "Steve Sloane" <ssloane1@rcn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:15:21 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi there . Here's my two cents for what it's worth. I have three Omni C's 
and think they are the most fun. The 1.8 filter makes a nice cw band width 
with the audio filter for those moments when the band is not too full. The 
500hz filter is very good but if you don't have one , the 250 hz is very 
usable and I have never found in line attenuation to be a problem. I have 
all combinations of them and you really can't go wrong with the 250. Maybe 
that is a repeat of old information and if so, indulge me. Good luck. 
Yesterday, I got an Omni C off the shelf after not using one for a while and 
moved my TS-850 and 870 aside and I gotta say, wow...still a very good 
receiver. Steve, KU3S
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marinus Loewensteijn" <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: [TenTec] CW filters Omni-C


>
> Recognizing a wealth of expertise on this mailing list I like to invite 
> your input on something that has kept me occupied for the past few days.
>
> I like to add a CW filter to my Omni-C. TenTec has sold out of the 217 
> (500 Hz) and still has the 218 (1.8 kHz) and 219 (250hz). In planning is a 
> replacement manufactured by Inrad.
>
> The consensus seems to be that the 500 Hz is more frequently used than the 
> 250 Hz.
>
> Have been looking at a few alternative options from Inrad, the 8 pole 1000 
> Hz #766, the 8 pole 400 hz # 759 and the 4 pole 600 Hz #763. Looking at 
> the curves on the old Inrad website I see that the 1000 Hz filter has 
> approx 4dB insertion loss, the 400 Hz approx 9 dB and the 600 Hz about 2.5 
> dB.
>
> The Omni-C has a filter board that can take the 1.8 khz and the 500 Hz 
> filter. This board has an amplifier to offset the filter losses. The 1.8 
> kHz filter position has a 1 dB amplification and the 500 Hz filter 
> position has a 7 dB amplification.
>
> (The 250 Hz filter has an approx 14 dB loss)
>
> I am thinking about using the 4 pole 600 Hz filter: I feel it will provide 
> better IMD / dynamic range performance because it can go in the 1.8 kHz 
> slot. This should go well with the 500 Hz audio filter which is built in.
>
> Am I missing something / have an error in my reasoning?
>
> Many thanks, 73, Marinus, ZL2ML
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
> http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.6/1404 - Release Date: 4/29/2008 
> 6:27 PM
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>