| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope |
| From: | "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 May 2008 09:24:13 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Why not just upgrade the scope in the OII . I am all for it ! John kb2huk----- Original Message ----- From: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:48 AM Subject: [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope Oh boy, this is one of the things I'd really like to see.That is, pan adaptor but, what about the internal spectrum scope. How is the pan adaptor different and why spend more money when there is a scope in theO2??? George W2YJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New generation ham's-offtopic but had to say something, Bob Close |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope, Kc9cdt |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope, george |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope, Kc9cdt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |