TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] K3 information

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K3 information
From: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed.krenn@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:56:04 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Since we are now encouraged to discuss other products, does anyone have an update on the status of Computeradio and the Dream Radio 1? Their website's most recent update was in 2004.

If memory serves, this was THE product that was going to herald a new era of amateur radio equipment design, leaving all others in its wake.

Ten Tec and Elecraft and ALL other amateur radio manufacturers were destined for the scrap heap of history........

Just wondering.................


Reed / WW3A


On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Paul K. wrote:

WELL SAID JIM!!!

PK



NO, it has become the TenTec Cheerleaders reflector -- better defined as a bunch of old farts, SOME of whom seem to be interested only in justifying their purchase of a particular radio, and not caring to learn anything about anything else going on in the world. Thankfully, some other members are here to learn more about their radios, fix them when they break, and share what we have learned with others. I am one of the latter group. TenTec and Elecraft are both very good companies, and make very good products. They are both American companies, both started by individual HAMS dedicated to doing it better. Al Kahn, K4FW, the co- founder of Ten Tec (and also Electro-Voice), was a MAJOR behind the scenes booster of Heathkit, and long time supporter of ARRL. He would have been very pleased with what Elecraft has done. It is quite sad that some folks are only able think in terms of "us against them." That's a big reason the world is in such a terrible fix.
73,

Jim Brown K9YC

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>