TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 546c advice

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 546c advice
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Reply-to: geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:38:41 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:21 +0000, jones_winston@bellsouth.net wrote:
>  
> I also once owned an Omni A (analog) and the later Omni C. Both are great 
> rigs.
> 
> 
> However, there was a design problem in the Omni C on 17 meters that was due 
> to the conversion scheme used.  I've heard it explained better by some 
> engineer-type hams than I can do. I understand it caused spurs to be 
> transmitted.
> 
17 Meters is 18 MHz. The IF is 9 MHz. The mixing scheme in that vintage
Omni mixed the PTO to 9 MHz. Mixers put out lots of second harmonic,
especially from the LO input. It probably was stronger than the mixed
signal. Hence a continuous transmitter spur. Also should show up on
receive when tuned to 18.0 MHz.
> 
> 73,
> Winston K4CWQ
> 
73, Jerry, K0CQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>