TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 546c advice

To: <geraldj@storm.weather.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 546c advice
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@embarqmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:42:52 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
True about the trouble on 18MHz.  My Omni-C was putting out a watt to 1.5 
watts KEY UP.  There were multiple birdies -- some moved with tuning, others 
were stationary.  I called Ten-Tec and spoke with Garland Jenkins about the 
trouble.  He said the only cure was a new rig -- that 18MHz was the big 
reason Ten-Tec went to the different mixing scheme.

73, Mike N4NT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 546c advice


> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:21 +0000, jones_winston@bellsouth.net wrote:
>>
>> I also once owned an Omni A (analog) and the later Omni C. Both are great 
>> rigs.
>>
>>
>> However, there was a design problem in the Omni C on 17 meters that was 
>> due to the conversion scheme used.  I've heard it explained better by 
>> some engineer-type hams than I can do. I understand it caused spurs to be 
>> transmitted.
>>
> 17 Meters is 18 MHz. The IF is 9 MHz. The mixing scheme in that vintage
> Omni mixed the PTO to 9 MHz. Mixers put out lots of second harmonic,
> especially from the LO input. It probably was stronger than the mixed
> signal. Hence a continuous transmitter spur. Also should show up on
> receive when tuned to 18.0 MHz.
>>
>> 73,
>> Winston K4CWQ
>>
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>