TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] G5RV

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] G5RV
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:09:29 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Then it's no longer a G5RV.  It is then a chunk of wire with a balanced feed 
attached to a tuner which matches the transmitter to the load.  Those work 
quite well but not as well as a 1/2 wave at the lowest intended frequency 
and those other higher frequencies harmonically related.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rsoifer@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] G5RV


>I don't consider myself an expert, but in my considerable experience with
> G5RVs and similar antennas, any G5RV can be improved by putting an antenna 
> tuner
> between the coax and the balanced feedline.  If that is done, the balanced
> feeder can be virtually any length at any frequency above 3.5 MHz.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
>
> In a message dated 1/31/2009 8:47:18 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
> mathenyr@marietta.edu writes:
>
> The G5RV  has been well reviewed by several experts.  The best review I
> know of  is by VE2CV and VE3KLO, in the ARRL Antenna Compendium Vol. 4.
>
> The long  and the short of it is this:  A G5RV is a 100 foot long piece of
> wire. The best way to feed that on multiple amateur bands would be with  a
> multi-band matching network a selected point on the wire.  Then the
> feedline (whatever type) would be in a matched condition and losses  would
> be least.  An automatic antenna tuner would be ideal for such  purpose,
> mounted at wherever the feedpoint is to be located.  If you  can't put the
> tuner up there, well-made openwire line will come close in  performance,
> with a proper tuner in the shack. You may have to trim the  open-wire
> length to get an easy tune on all bands.  But the antenna is  a 100 foot
> piece of wire--with all the traits of any 100 foot piece of  wire!
>
> Adding baluns, stubs, coax, etc. as is often shown will only add  loss
> to the system.  That loss is what improves the match on some  bands!
>
> Pattern wise, that feedpoint mentioned above should be at the  center if
> you want best results at 20 meters and below.  If the higher  bands are
> your favorite, then there may well be a better spot...perhaps at  an end.
> But that will create other problems, and probably  losses.
>
> The marvelious thing, however, is this:  Despite all that  one can
> find wrong with this "100 feet of wire" there are a gizilion and a  half 
> of
> these things out there making QSO's at this very second.  It  doesn't take
> a great antenna to make a lot of contacts.
>
> Ralph  Matheny
> K8RYU
> 207 Gibbons Place
> Marietta Ohio   45750
> mathenyr@marietta.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec  mailing  list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> **************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, 
> stay
> up-to-date with the latest news. 
> (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>