TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 041 firmware rev

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 041 firmware rev
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:12:33 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I noticed that the low level in the AF AGC makes the NR not work very well. 
Most of the signals are below the threshold.  NR does work better than in 
the past when using RF AGC.

         Ron   N6IE
      www.N6IE.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF]" <peter@frenning.dk>
To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 041 firmware rev


> Ron Castro skrev:
>> I have noticed that the levels between the AF and RF AGC's are quite
>> different.  The AF is very low compared to RF.
>>
>>          Ron Castro
>>  Chief Technical Officer
>>     Results Radio, LLC
>>                N6IE
>>       www.N6IE.com
>>
> Same here, but doesn't seem to have detrimental effects other than you
> have to twist up the AF encoder...
>
> 

-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 302 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>