| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO? |
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:34:24 +0100 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
As I understand it, the phase noise performance of a DDS is not as good as a well-designed PTO. Would a better solution be to use a "huff & puff" style stabiliser for the existing PTO? That way you get the frequency stability and the low phase noise. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO?, Bwana Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] 538 Jupiter For Sale, john |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO?, Bwana Bob |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO?, veast1 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |