I did not draw the same conclusion from the piece.
I purchased the Palstar tuner because they seemed
rather close in performance and I took the advice of
several local hams in the lunch bunch. I thought they
were all very close, and I, too, was surprised the MFJ
was as highly regarded - I was hoping for a clear winner.
I think this is the piece you refer to.
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0302.pdf
I just found "corrections" to the piece here...
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0409.pdf
Maybe they change the original charts sufficiently to support
your conclusion ??? I did not realize there was a correction
bit when I first read the piece.
I am gong to re-visit the whole matter....
============ James =====================
Arthur Trampler wrote:
> Some years back QST reviewed several external auto-tuners
and with respect to efficiency, the Ten Tec 253 came out far
ahead of most competitors, as did (surprising me) an MFJ tuner.
==========================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|