| To: | <geraldj@weather.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio |
| From: | "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:27:05 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jerry,Can you suggest an appropriate compound ? Perhaps a source of same ? I suppose the big suppliers have most of this stuff available. Its not so easy to find any more - guess cause the Ham market has gotten so small. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 19:59 -0600, Stephen Cannon wrote:Alan,I was wondering about the ferrite materials. My initial thought was to use31 Material (because Material 31 is designed for HF); however, I further thought that noise in other frequency ranges (other than HF) may affect signals within some of the electronics. Should I just stick with 31 Material on HF receivers or do you have additional suggestions?You want a lossy material at the subject frequency, not one used for transformers at the frequency to be filtered. Typically that means a considerably higher permeability for the noise filter toroid than a transformer toroid. 73, Jerry, K0CQStephen AD7TD_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] FS: ORION, k1zn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio, Jim Brown K9YC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |