TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio

To: <geraldj@weather.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:27:05 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry,

Can you suggest an appropriate compound ? Perhaps a source of same ? I suppose the big suppliers have most of this stuff available.

Its not so easy to find any more - guess cause the Ham market has gotten so small.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII: RF in TX Audio


On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 19:59 -0600, Stephen Cannon wrote:
Alan,
I was wondering about the ferrite materials. My initial thought was to use
31 Material (because Material 31 is designed for HF); however, I further
thought that noise in other frequency ranges (other than HF) may affect
signals within some of the electronics.  Should I just stick with 31
Material on HF receivers or do you have additional suggestions?

You want a lossy material at the subject frequency, not one used for
transformers at the frequency to be filtered. Typically that means a
considerably higher permeability for the noise filter toroid than a
transformer toroid.

73, Jerry, K0CQ


Stephen AD7TD


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>