James,
Given the superior DSP in the O-VII compared to the O-VI, that's an awfully
hearty endorsement and I appreciate it.
The O-VI has a low pass audio DSP filter and a peaking filter as well, but I
bet they are 16 bit engines, and the technology is almost 20 years old; much
has changed.
73 and hope to work you on the bands. I read your QRZ.COM bio and I am mostly
a CW operator, and enjoy everything from from QRS to slow QRQ so maybe we'll
meet on 40 meters. I really respect that you are choosing to learn CW, and I
hope you come to enjoy it.
73,
Art
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> wrote:
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ the best and other great radios
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 10:52 AM
I use a Timewave DSP-599zx with an Omni VII, and it is
worth it to me.
Last Spring at Dayton, I purchased the West MountainRadio
CLRdsp noise reduction device, but have yet to deploy it,
as I have the Timewave DSP unit and have bee loathe to
take it off line.
I guess that means I am satisfied with it. ;-)
Parenthetically, the West Mountain CLRdsp is very light weight,
and has a lousy paint job - finger prints show up on it so it
looks kinda disreputable once you have handled it a bit.
I will have to tear up the station and set up an
A/B side-by-side comparison.
Just MY take. Your mileage, of course, might vary from mine.
=============== Richards -K8JHR =====================
On 1/21/2010 10:26 AM, Art Trampler wrote:
>
> Maybe I just need to pony up to a Timewave DSP599Z...has anyone
added that to a 564 or Option 3, and if so, was it worth it?
>
>====================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|