TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16
From: ken brookner <kenb@brookner.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:53:04 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
i think tentec has, over the years, made it quite obvious what their
commitment to the orions is...

ky5g

On 04/14/2010 10:50 AM, tentec-request@contesting.com wrote:
> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:42:34 -0500
> From: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
>
>
> All-in-all, it is a baffling situation.  It has to make everyone wonder
> about TenTec's commitment to the O and O-II.
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16, ken brookner <=