| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:00:33 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I don't think that is true. It does not have one less safety feature. My Omni VII -IS- protected. It shuts down entirely if SWR is too high, whereas the JA rigs lower power until they get comfortable. But the high SWR remains in any case. I prefer to fix that than worry about how much power is getting to the antenna. ======================== K8JHR =========================== On 4/25/2010 1:22 PM, shristov wrote: the only difference between a TenTec TX and, say, a Kenwood TX is lack of circuitry which reduces the power with high SWR. In fact, it has one safety feature less. =========================================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] elastic cord specs?, geoffrey mendelson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] elastic cord specs?, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited.,, shristov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited.,, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |