TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 707 Mike

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 707 Mike
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:40:38 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
That makes perfect sense to me, as I believe your new microphone has a dynamic type of microphone element, whereas you indicate your previous microphone has an electret condenser type element. Dynamic mics typically have a substantially lower output signal strength (sometimes referred to as "open circuit voltage" or "open circuit sensitivity") than electret condenser mic elements, which typically run substantially hotter - and many computer type electret condensers run quite hot.

I would likely boost the hardware gain a bit more, so that I could run the rig mic gain at about 50 % - I am under the impression the rig AGC likes it better that way. I will leave it to others to explain better than I why, but that is what seems to work best in my experience.

This is consistent with other applications - I used to test microphones and write product reviews for use with speech recognition software and encountered the same thing as you find with your rig.

Hope this helps some.

=========================  K8JHR  ==============================



On 6/29/2010 8:10 PM, Rsoifer@aol.com wrote:

I have H/W mic gain set to 12 dB and the front panel MIC  set to 75.  With
the 706 condenser mike, I set H/W mic gain to 6 dB and  front panel MIC to
60.  I have a rather soft speaking voice, but the 707  seems to need a lot
more gain than the 706.

Does anyone else have experience with this to share?

_______________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>