TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???
From: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Philip,

Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I
doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one
is an RF processor just as the old one is.

-- 
 Neal, NL7VL

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:04 -0500
"Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>Good morning folks,
>I have not seen any replies to my posts, the last one asking if any
>one has tried the TT 715 speech processor with older TT radios.
>
>If I did something wrong or offended any one, I apologize.
>
>Phil (Andy) W3LI
>
>                                         
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>