| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO |
| From: | "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net> |
| Reply-to: | geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:02:46 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
If the DDS setting was independent of the readout in the radio it
wouldn't take into account differences between the crystals where some
bands are offset from even MHz to cut down on receive birdies. That
means accuracy is dependent on the accuracy of the offset programming
and the display counter clock yet.
73, Jerry, K0CQ On 3/22/2011 2:50 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: Greg, The DDS modification still uses the Corsair's "native" frequency readout circuitry, so setting accuracy is no better or worse than with the PTO. 73, Steve G3TXQ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO, Don Rasmussen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO, Carl Moreschi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO, Steve Hunt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II DDS VFO, Carl Moreschi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |